Sep 14, 2012

Average Individual Annual Radiation Exposure Dose in Over 400,000 Nuclear Industry Workers from 15 Countries



In Japan, the maximum annual individual radiation exposure dose for an individual was 1 mSv before the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident.  The 1 mSv included exposure to artificial sources of radiation, such as medical exposure, not taking into consideration exposure to natural background radiation from the Earth and the Universe.

After the Fukushima accident, the regulatory dose limit was initially raised to 20 mSv per year for all age groups.  It was later lowered to 5 mSv per year for children.

Ian Goddard, in his video “Fukushima Radiation NOT SAFE,” mentions a study done on over 400,000 nuclear workers from 15 countries, which was the largest nuclear worker study ever conducted, involving 51 radiation scientists.

“Fukushima Radiation NOT SAFE”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ywKv0dj3UuY#t=6m2s

The papers related to the study mentioned above are these:

http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1667/RR0553.1
The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Estimates of Radiation-related Cancer Risks

http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.1667/RR0554.1
The 15-Country Collaborative Study of Cancer Risk among Radiation Workers in the Nuclear Industry: Design, Epidemiological Methods and Descriptive Results

Average individual annual radiation exposure doses were calculated from data found in Table 5 of the second study listed, and the results were tabulated and highlighted for easy referencing.

   ***

Average individual annual radiation exposure dose in nuclear workers in 15 countries

In Japan, an average individual annual dose for nuclear workers was 2.33 mSv:  less than a half of the current “temporary” regulatory dose limit for Japanese children, which is 5 mSv; and almost one-tenth of the current “temporary” regulatory dose limit for adults, which is 20 mSv.  An overall average was even lower at 1.85 mSv.

In other words, Fukushima residents are being exposed to radiation doses that average nuclear workers are not even allowed to receive.  In some areas with high ambient radiation levels, actual annual exposure will be higher than regulatory dose limits when taking into consideration internal radiation exposure from contaminated food and water.

This article features a few images of Geiger counter readings from a Date-city, Fukushima, elementary school.  There are many other places with such micro hotspots in Fukushima and surrounding prefecture, or even in Tokyo Metropolitan region.   

http://enenews.com/photo-400-microsieverts-hour-elementary-school-60-kilometers-fukushima-daiichi


In conclusion, the regulatory annual dose limits of 5 mSv for children and 20 mSv for adults in Japan are much higher than the actual average individual annual dose of 2.33 mSv in Japanese nuclear workers or 1.85 mSv in overall average, which was associated with an increased cancer risk in adult nuclear workers.

   ***


How the average individual annual dose was obtained:

From Table 5 Extended in the study, as shown below, an average cumulative dose (mSv) was divided by an average individual cumulative dose (years) to obtain an average individual dose per year for each country, which is listed in the right column of the table above.

You can calculate your annual exposure from this ”Radiation Dose Chart.”
http://www.new.ans.org/pi/resources/dosechart/

Sep 10, 2012

FRCSR (Fukushima Radiation Contamination Symptoms Research)10 August 2012 Report #4


10 August 2012 report

Report #4

Case collection period:  October 21, 2011 to August 10, 2012
Total number of reported cases:   529
Total number of reported symptoms and categories:  31 categories and 270 symptoms

Commentary

1. Distribution map of individuals who reported cases

At the seventeenth month since the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident, the distribution map of individuals who reported cases has covered just about the entire country, as seen in colored portions of Figure 1.  Considering that there are evacuees living in a few uncolored prefectures left, all prefectures now have people with symptoms.  As I have stated from the beginning and as I insist on stating repeatedly, physicians in every specialty medical field all over Japan need to acquire understanding and discernment in regards to medical care for radiation exposure:  this is an obvious and urgent matter.




After reviewing all the symptoms reported so far over and over and asking additional questions, I speculate that the main point of drastic symptoms currently reported in the section, “2. Symptoms,” is influenced by where they were and what they did during the fallout from March 11 through 21, especially on March 14 and 15.  (Reference 1: Hourly still images of the fallout simulation animation from IRSN.  http://frmr-jp.blogspot.com/2012/09/20113.html)

Radioactive material was spread and fell in places by air currents.  An extremely progressive onset of symptoms have certainly been seen in those who were in neighboring municipalities at the time of the accident, but also subsequently in anybody who was outdoor under the contaminated atmosphere, children who have high sensitivities to radiation, and people with chronic illnesses within the area approximately 200 km from ground zero:  This is speculated to be due to the initial intake of high-concentration/high-dose radionuclides through inhalation.  At the present time (September 2012), we are beginning to see health effects on thyroid gland and leukocytes (white blood cells), and onset of cancer:  This fast progression is understandable when considering the effect of potentially involved radionuclides.  In addition, the fact that an abnormally prominent increase was seen in complaints of bone pain, which quadrupled from January to February, and muscle pain, which doubled from February to March, is thought to reflect the effect of high-concentration/high-dose radionuclides.

All people who live in the areas where the fallout passed through need to watch any changes in their own physical conditions, keeping track of blood tests and a thyroid thyroid examination.  At least children need to get thyroid ultrasound examination regardless of the presence of subjective symptoms.  The issue of “cumulative dose,” as discussed in internal radiation exposure, goes without saying, but in this accident, in terms of the time factor, whether you were exposed to high dose radionuclides or not is an extremely huge reason for onset of symptoms.

In addition, the effect of topography on air currents is such that the wind from the Pacific Ocean coast blows into the inland and stops at mountain ranges.  This explains the characteristic in a 250-km area where reports originate in cities located at the base of mountains yet facing the Pacific Ocean.  In particular, contamination is expected to go through “city concentration” in cities where air circulation is poor, and ”accumulation” from hills into low-lying areas.  Therefore, there is a higher probability of being exposed to high-dose radionuclides as you spend more time in cities.

The extent of radiation contamination in the Metropolitan region is a concern.  Thus I calculated average radiation levels from measurements at 5 cm above ground and 50 cm above ground at a total of 70 elementary and middle schools in Adachi-ward in east Tokyo, as reported in April 2012.  (Reference 2 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aq8f83tqq7QudGxiLW9hVVZtVE9qanZzdnhSYlBmc3c#gid=0)
An overall average is 0.65 microsievert/hr at 5 cm and 0.40 microsievert/hr at 50 cm.  Averaging of these two numbers yields 0.53 microsievert/hr up to 50 cm above ground.  In other words, an annual exposure dose of 4.30 mSv is obtained after adding a natural background radiation dose of 1.4 mSv to the dose from being outside for four hours a day, calculated on this site by using an average of 0.53 microsievert/hr: http://radi-y.com/.  The distance between the accident location and Adachi-ward is 213 km, but this exposure dose is about the same as the areas along the Pacific Ocean in Minamisoma-city, which is 25.5 km from Fukushima Dai-ichi or even higher in some places.  (Reference 3: http://www.city.minamisoma.lg.jp/mpsdata/web/5462/minamisoma_120416.jpg)  Many residents of the Metropolitan region are either concerned about contamination in Fukushima or totally oblivious to it, living as if nothing ever happened, but they need to become aware that they themselves are in a similarly contaminated environment.


2. Symptoms

The number of symptoms per person increased from 4.9 in January to 5.6.  (Reference 4: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aq8f83tqq7QudDNMTWdaS0c3Qkd5QnBWOHZwSXJLOEE#gid=0)

Each category showed an average rate of increase of 1.1 to 1.2 times since the previous survey result.  Categories whose rates of increase exceeded the average rate of increase are: upper gastrointestinal system including vomiting and nausea at 1.3 times; tumors including pituitary adenoma and cystic tumor at 1.4 times, and endocrine system mainly related to thyroid gland at 1.6 times.

Reports of tumors have begun to come in.  There has been a rapid increase of endocrine symptoms, which might be a preliminary stage before tumors appear.  In addition, there have been multiple reports of pediatric thyroid cancer from the Kanto region and the Metropolitan area, 250 km away from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power station.  In other words, even before a diagnosis of thyroid cancer is established by physicians, it seems that cancer was germinating and growing within one year of the Fukushima nuclear accident.   In Chernobyl, pediatric cancer developed over a period of 5 to 10 years after the accident; but in the case of Fukushima, it appears that canceration took only one-third of the time.  The effects of the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear accident on human body revealed an onset of cancer within one year to one and a half year; the speed of symptom progression is three to five times that of Chernobyl.

In the thyroid examination conducted on 38,114 Fukushima children, 13,460 which represented 35.8% of the total examined had thyroid nodules and/or cysts.  In Chernobyl, 5% of the population had some physical findings/symptoms one year after the accident:  In Fukushima the occurrence was seven times as many as Chernobyl in one year.  Consequently, in comparison with Chernobyl, it is estimated that the speed of onset of symptoms would be 3 to 5 times faster and the number of cases would be more than 7 times as many.

From the beginning of the survey up to this month, symptoms constantly increasing include fatigue, sleepiness, headaches, dizziness, eczema, urticaria, pruritis, epistaxis, canker sores, sore throat, chest pain, cough, sputum, and diarrhea.  In menstruating women, almost 100%  have reported symptoms such as irregular menstrual periods, hypomenorrhea, and amenorrhea.

In addition, from winter to spring, there were unusual increases in all types of infectious diseases, such as an explosive spread of influenza, food poisoning such as E. Coli O-157 in rainy season, rubella, mycoplasma pneumonia, chlamydial pneumonia. (Refer to the Infectious Disease Surveillance Center at the National Institute of Infectious Diseases. http://www.nih.go.jp/niid/en/)  It is possible to attribute an increase in infectious diseases to depressed resistance, but on the other hand, these symptoms could be attributable as early symptoms of leukemia.  It is a pathophysiological fact that Merkmal of leukemia includes fatigue, cold-like symptoms, and bleeding tendency such as easy bruising and epistaxis.  If the recurrent cold-like symptoms since last year are due to changes in white blood cells, the number of future leukemia cases might be beyond our imagination.  Already there are many reports of abnormalities in white blood cell count and neutrophils.

Part of hematology-related reports (all reports are from a 250-km radius area).

*A relative has chronic myelomonocytic leukemia with a prevalence of 1 in 100,000.
*A fifty-year-old man from Higashimurayama had abnormal blood test at a health check-up in March, 2012, and was eventually was diagnosed with leukemia.
*Seven-year-old boy: WBC over 10,000 with 43% neutrophils in January 2012, but WBC was 6,300 with 25% neutrophils in June 2012.  Three-year-old boy: WBC over 10,000 with 28% neutrophils in October 2010 and WBC 7,300 with 28% neutrophils in June 2012.
*A six-year-old daughter with a slight decrease in WBC in blood test from last June.  She has not gained weight.
*A sixteen-year-old girl and her mother both had decreased WBC.  The daughter lost weight.  Blood test from November 2011 showed decreased WBC, platelets and RBC.  CK, GPT, ALP and lymphocytes were slightly high.

At a hospital in west Tokyo, there have been more patients with multiple myeloma.  The hospital pharmacist reports an increased demand for Velcade (Bortezomib), a multiple myeloma medication, and the doctors cannot figure out why there are so many cases of esophageal cancer or findings of abnormalities in upper GI endoscopy.  Moreover, in terms of cancers, there have been reports of breast cancer and colon cancer.

Also, there have been significant increases in diagnosed cases of “Kawasaki Disease” in hospitals within a 300-km radius range.  Kawasaki Disease was discovered in 1961 by a Japan Red Cross Hospital pediatrician, Dr. Tomisaku Kawasaki.  The disease was named after him in 1967. (Reference 5:  Kawasaki Disease Wikipedia entry and Japan Kawasaki Disease Association case photos)  Main symptoms include ocular conjunctival injection, enlarged cervical lymph nodes, rash and erythema.  The cause is supposedly unknown, but these symptoms are extremely similar to radiation exposure symptoms.

Regarding childbirth, a birth weight of less than 1,500 grams is defined as a very low birth weight baby.  There have been several reports of abortions for fetal weight never exceeding 1,000 grams.  Also there has been a baby born with a birth weight of 1,000 grams with a hole in the heart.  And there are other reports of premature births and miscarriages.  It seems that the number of abortions is increasing.  On August 29, 2012, it was announced that the National Center for Child Health and Development (Tokyo) and Showa University (Tokyo) decided a policy to begin testing blood of pregnant women for presence of Downs Syndrome with 99% accuracy.  Other medical institutions are also in consideration of introducing the same test.  Reports of an introduction of such tests, in anticipation of increased needs, and a new development of medical technology seem to be more common and even seem intentional in timing.

Within a 300-km radius, there are marked occurrences of dizziness and hearing loss.  Several days after the accident, there were reports of severe dizziness in a 20-km zone from ground zero.  These symptoms are spreading to people living in a 250-km radius area one year after the accident.  In connection with this expansion of affected areas, effects on the central nervous system are also serious.

The central nervous system effects include such symptoms as lassitude with fatigue, memory decline/loss, forgetfulness, agraphia, loss of mental calculation, motor dysfunction such as falling, but it is difficult to collect data because they may not be aware of changes in their own characteristics other than what they can perceive themselves for self-reporting.  However, this issue is actually more serious than specific physical symptoms.  It is speculated the number of these cases might be as many as or even more than the cases with physical symptoms.  This constitute an extremely large social issue as Japan continues a process of restoration from now on.

Mental symptoms, just like physical symptoms, get worse in those who already had chronic conditions.  For instance, if someone already had depression, there will be worsening of depression.  In addition, there is an accentuation of basic personality or characteristics.  Someone who was already nervous will become even more nervous as if driven into a corner.  On the other hand, someone can gain overly positive attitudes, ignoring many symptoms including chest pain.  These changes in personality and characteristics may be subtle at this point of time, but they will worsen with time.

In particular, those living in contaminated areas who have subjective symptoms such as lassitude with fatigue need to evacuate at an early stage.  Symptom progression is fast, and they won’t be able to make appropriate decisions.  In other words, they might lose a will to evacuate or become unable to act on it.

The person himself/herself is not aware of these extremely slow yet certain changes.  The entire society as a whole will slowly change.  For instance, Japan is known as a country that takes a long time to make a decision due to its vertically-structured society with an emphasis on relationship of “master and servant.”  On the other hand, Japan was strict with time and has maintained the world’s highest quality in the manufacturing industry.  There are already many occurrences of human errors at a work place, as in increases in returned products due to defects, and the error is unnoticed even after the product is eventually finished.

The second-generation and the third-generation descendants of Hiroshima/Nagasaki atomic bomb victims report miscarriages, stillbirths, pneumonia, cancer, thyroid diseases, epistaxis, Kawasaki Disease, joint pain, cystitis and hematuria.  It is speculated that sensitivity to radiation might be high when ancestors have been exposed to radiation.  It is truly unforgivable that these people are exposed to radiation again.


3. Medical Care

Despite the presence of subjective symptoms in many people, the governmental medical system is not facing the reality at all, only creating appearance of pretending to do something, and also implementing a powerful cover-up.

The person that is at the top of this scheme is Shunichi Yamashita, who is the vice president of Fukushima Medical University and Fukushima Prefecture Radiation Health Risk Management Adviser.  Yamashita told a German weekly news magazine, Spiegel, on August 19, 2011, that he would examine all 2 million residents of Fukushima prefecture to set a science record.

Yamashita: “All 2 million residents of Fukushima prefecture. It is a big task and would set a science record. The government just decided about compensation payments for people affected by the nuclear accident. Through such applications we want to try to contact also those who moved outside of Fukushima.”

(Reference 6: http://www.spiegel.de/international/world/studying-the-fukushima-aftermath-people-are-suffering-from-radiophobia-a-780810.html)

In other words, as you can see in this letter to the Japan Thyroid Association members, he intends to actively ignore thyroid abnormalities in children, merely observing how the effect of radiation exposure progresses in the body.

(Translation of this letter can be found here: http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.com/2012/05/fukushima-childrens-thyroid-examination.html)







Translation of the letter shown below:

To:  Japan Thyroid Association Members
From:  Shunichi Yamashita, president, Japan Thyroid Association
Subject:  How to respond to Fukushima nuclear accident--No need for thyroid-blocking in children; please have correct knowledge of radiation.

“As of March 18, 2911, the Japanese Society of Nuclear Medicine has published a statement that says, “No need for thyroid-blocking in children.” with a title, “For those affected by the disaster, especially those with children,” as shown here.  http://www.jsnm.org/japanese/11-03-18

In addition, a remark titled “Correct knowledge of radiation” by Professor Keigo Endo of Gunma University Department of Nuclear Medicine has been posted in the local newspaper.

I hope you find this information helpful.”


Moreover, because of letters such as these and their own ignorance, many physicians are either disinterested in, or negative about the relationship between patients’ poor physical health and radiation.  There are some malicious cases:  Some physicians refuse to provide medical care or refuse to hand over test results, such as ultrasound images of thyroid, to patients; in some cases patients have been charged a large “fee” for copies of radiological images.

There is a concern regarding physicians practicing medicine in areas receiving fallout as seen in Reference 1 above.  If they are either oblivious of or negative about the radiation contamination, they might not be actively taking protective measures.  In other words, there is a possibility that physicians themselves have been exposed to radiation, developing central nervous system symptoms.  We might begin to see an increase in medical errors in the future.  





**

This is an issue not just in Fukushima:  There are nuclear power plants and nuclear weapons all over the world.  Most people know very little about what radiation exposure is even though radiation kills every living organism and affects generations after generations of descendants.  Whether it was from an act of war, such as Hiroshima and Nagasaki, or the result of accidents as in Chernobyl, Three Mile Island and Fukushima, everything is covered up in full force in order to maintain an appearance of economic and military power:  Every country affected always acts as if nobody has been exposed to radiation.  There is no honest and decent medical care for radiation exposure due to powerful cover-up and pressure which is enabled by accompanying makeshift measures: This is despite the fact that there were 18,125 nuclear weapons and 436 nuclear power plants accounted for around the whole world in 2010.


Reported by Shino Yasutomo

Executive Director
FRCSR

English translation by Dr. Yuri Hiranuma
Medical Information Director
FRCSR

Sep 7, 2012

Regarding Comments Made by IPPNW Physicians About Fukushima Thyroid Examination Results

There was a press conference in Tokyo, Japan, on August 29, 2012, by members of the International Physicians for Prevention of Nuclear War (IPPNW).  This followed the delegation’s visit to Fukushima Prefecture after the IPPNW World Congress was held in Hiroshima from August 24 through 26.

IPPNW delegation’s statement: International physicians’ recommendations for protecting health after the Fukushima nuclear disaster

http://fukushimasymposium.files.wordpress.com/2012/08/20120829_ippnw_recommendations_fukushima.pdf (English)

http://www.ippnw.de/commonFiles/pdfs/Atomenergie/International_physicians_recommandation-dt.pdf (German)

   ***

IPPNW’s recommendations such as medically, socially and financially supporting those with anticipated exposure over 5 mSv (1 mSv for children and pregnant women), based on actual radiation exposure levels, and lowering the annual radiation exposure limit to 1 mSv are logical and appropriate.

However, statements made by two physicians regarding the high number of thyroid abnormalities found in Fukushima children raise some concern.

As you can see in the following article, which is a complete English translation of the thyroid examination section of the Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey, 35% of 38,114 children tested so far, out of 360,000 eligible Fukushima children, have been found to have thyroid nodules and/or cysts upon thyroid ultrasound examination.

http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.com/2012/07/thyroid-examination-by-fukushima.html

Below is a transcript of statements made by Dr. Tilman Ruff, a co-president-elect of IPPNW and an Australian physician specializing in infectious diseases and public health, and Dr. Peter Karamoskos, an Australian nuclear radiologist.

*****************************************************************************************************
Q:  What do you think about the high number of thyroid abnormalities found in Fukushima children?

Ruff
”So these data are clearly important and need to be conducted and compiled and these surveys repeated on a regular basis.  We think that’s entirely appropriate.  The results of such studies are dependent on the method.  And what will be important in relation to the follow-up of those affected in Fukushima will be the trends over time and the comparison to the other areas which have not been so contaminated.

It’s true this survey is almost certainly a baseline survey.  We won’t expect from biology or experience in Chernobyl or anywhere else that thyroid abnormalities will be evident so soon after the accident.  The diagnostic criteria that are used are very important and must be consistent and comparable between studies.  Most of these cysts and nodules are very small.  We think that the decision to conduct a study in the near future in a less affected area of Japan is a good decision.”

Karamoskos
“The study that showed the number of nodules is commensurate with what we know about thyroid glands and previous studies.  Contrary to the popular opinion, nodules are quite common in children.  Most children don’t have them, of course, but they are quite common and the more sensitive the ultrasound modality that we use the more we detect.  Certainly this proportion of nodules in children we are seeing is well within the bounds of what we know to be common in children.  

In fact, Dr. Suzuki in Fukushima said that they were actually including nodules which were 1 mm in diameter.  Most studies in the past have not included these.  I am not surprised they found 35% of cases with nodules.  

Finally, it’s important to underscore that nodules and cysts in thyroid are not necessarily diseases.  They are actually part of the normal evolution of the thyroid gland.  So families with children with nodules and cysts should not be overly concerned.  This is a baseline study.  We want to establish what the baseline is to follow these people up in the future to determine whether any of them will develop thyroid cancer in the future.  It’s not that they have diseases at the moment.”

Q:  Any controversy between Fukushima Medical University doctors and IPPNW doctors regarding how it was difficult for Fukushima residents to obtain a second opinion?

Karamoskos
“It is certainly the basic right of patients to request a second opinion.  Nobody will deny that right.”

Ruff
“I just want to conclude this or at least to make a comment that it’s clear that thyroid abnormalities are a significant concern here.  The experience of a rapid increase in thyroid cancer in children, unexpectedly early after Chernobyl, is a very important lesson.  And the recent WHO report of radiation doses in Fukushima estimates thyroid doses for children well in the range where stable iodine should be given by international guidelines.  And it was not used in Japan.  So that increases the importance of follow-up of thyroid issues.”

Q: After your visit to Fukushima yesterday, what do they think about Fukushima residents, adults and children, still continuing to live there especially with the accident still going on, in consideration of low-dose radiation exposure?

Ruff
“I think given the well-recognized and documented increase in susceptibility of children to the long-term adverse consequences of radiation, it’s certainly appropriate that priority be given to them and also to pregnant women.

I think it’s important that we have consistent, objective criteria for assisting people who choose to relocate, especially with children.  This should be based on the likely dose they may be exposed to.  This is an important issue of social equity because we found that many people would choose to relocate if they were able to do so.”
*******************************************************************************************************

With all due respect, neither Ruff nor Karamoskos is a pediatrician or a thyroid specialist.  
Nor do they really have a firm grasp of the level of contamination that has spread not only in Fukushima but the neighboring prefectures, and actually all over Japan.  Nor do they realize what is really going on with people in Fukushima and neighboring prefectures, behind the charade put on by the government officials and Fukushima Medical University.

Are they aware of the pressure exerted on thyroid specialists by a letter from Shunichi Yamashita, Fukushima Prefecture Radiation Health Risk Management Adviser, vice president of Fukushima Medical University, and president of the Japan Thyroid Association?  Even though Fukushima Medical University insists that patients are not prohibited from seeking a second opinion, the fact is that it is exceedingly difficult to find a physician who is willing to do it.  There have been anecdotal reports from people who were told by physicians outside Fukushima, “We have been told not to examine people who came from Fukushima.”

http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.com/2012/05/fukushima-childrens-thyroid-examination.html

Actually, it is not just in Fukushima.  People in Tokyo and surrounding Kanto region are complaining of thyroid abnormalities:  Some families who evacuated to western Japan were dismayed to learn that their children had thyroid nodules and/or cysts upon ultrasound examination.  When they take their children to “thyroid specialists.” they are told “It’s natural.” “It’s congenital.” and they are often not even given copies of the ultrasound images, which they are entitled to.  Some hospitals blatantly refuse to provide medical care to people who would like to have thyroid examination done due to concerns regarding radiation exposure.  A recent Mainichi Shimbun article describing some of these issues has been translated here:

http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.com/2012/08/thyroid-examination-cabinet-office.html

The above article refers to the government’s decision to implement a comparative thyroid examination in places other than Fukushima to be used as a control, as referred to by Ruff.  Indeed it is a necessary study, and it makes sense to keep conditions as similar to the Fukushima study as possible, in terms of equipments and examiners, but it would be wise to have a neutral party to oversee the study, as Fukushima Medical University seems to lack transparency.

Karamoskos refers to a statement by Shinichi Suzuki, a Professor in Regulatory Organ Surgery, a physician in charge of thyroid examination, and also a co-signer of the aforementioned letter from the Japan Thyroid Association. http://www.fmu.ac.jp/kenkyu/Profiles/6/0000584/prof_e.html  

Suzuki told Karamoskos that nodules with 1 mm in diameter were included in the 35% result, detectable due to sensitivity of the ultrasound equipments used.  However, the result published so far does not offer a size breakdown below 5 mm, as you can see in these tables excerpted from pages 14 and 15 of the Seventh Report of the Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey.

http://www.pref.fukushima.jp/imu/kenkoukanri/240612shiryou.pdf

English translation of the thyroid examination result is available as PDF here.
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B68f83tqq7QuZUdCZXhTLVl2dEE/edit

Breakdown of thyroid nodules by size:  201 had nodules equal to or smaller than 5.0 mm, but there is no further breakdown to show how many had 1.0 mm nodules.

Breakdown of thyroid cysts by size:  12,414 had cysts equal to or smaller than 5.0 mm, but there is no further breakdown to show how many had 1.0 mm cysts.


How the guideline used for the Fukushima thyroid examination was established is a bit unclear.  According to this guideline, children with nodules 5.0 mm or smaller or cysts 20.0 mm or smaller are to be followed up in two years.

A planning committee for "Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey" consists of members from Fukushima Medical University, National Institute of Radiological Sciences (NIRS), Radiation Effects Research Foundation (RERF), Hiroshima University and Nagasaki University.  Reading through the minutes of the proceedings of the planning committee for Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey, it was mentioned that "Diagnostic Criteria Inquiry Subcommittee of Thyroid Examination Advisory Committee" was established consisting of the following seven organizations.

Japan Thyroid Association http://www.japanthyroid.jp/
Japan Association of Endocrine Surgeons http://jaes.umin.ac.jp/
Japan Association of Thyroid Surgery http://square.umin.ac.jp/thyroids/
The Japan Society of Ultrasonics in Medicine http://www.jsum.or.jp/
The Japan Society of Sonographers http://www.jss.org/
The Japanese Society for Pediatric Endocrinology http://jspe.umin.jp/
Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology http://www.jabts.net/

However, no record could be found, at least on the Internet, regarding minutes of proceedings of the “Diagnostic Criteria Inquiry Subcommittee of Thyroid Examination Advisory Committee,” and the Subcommittee seems to lack transparency.  (Incidentally, Japan Association of Breast and Thyroid Sonology has been commissioned to the comparative study project as of August 31, 2012, after apparently winning an open competitive bidding.  Will there be transparency?)

Thus there are too many reasons for the Japanese public to fully trust Fukushima Medical University to act in good faith and with transparency.  And when hearing about individual cases, through story after story by involved families, regarding the lack of care and information given to their children, the 35% ceases to be just a number.

At least Ruff points out the fact that stable iodine was not administered even though “Preliminary dose estimation from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami “ published by World Health Organization, estimated thyroid doses for children “well in the range qualifying for stable iodine by international guidelines.”  He cautions that thyroid needs followed up even more closely because of it.  However, the estimated thyroid doses by the WHO report might be underestimated for various reasons.

Objectivity is certainly important in “science.”  However, what about if “objective data” being used possibly lacks accuracy?  It might be inevitable that foreigners should rely on “official” information sources, such as “Preliminary dose estimation from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami “ for “objective data,” largely because of a language barrier and also due to its “official” status.  Even though a lot of reliable information regarding contamination might be available online, through privately funded soil and food testing, non-Japanese speakers might have difficulty accessing them.

“Official” radiation measurements do not mean they are truthful.  For instance, it was a surprise to many Japanese that the WHO report assumed that nearby residents were “immediately” evacuated, but that did not actually happen.  Because the government did not release the radioactive plume forecast, some residents fled in the direction of the plume, unbeknownst to them at the time, with children in tow.  Local residents have many stories about their own experiences, yet such valuable information cannot be converted into objective data, and thus disappear beneath all the numbers and calculations.  Dose estimation based on inaccurate premises cannot produce reliable results, but that is what is referred to by scientists and researchers.  Sadly, any studies published, based on the WHO report or government reports, might lack validity and reliability due to inaccuracies of the original data.

Moreover, ambient radiation levels now regularly reported in many municipalities in Japan are only an indication of contamination near the monitoring posts.  It certainly is important to know how contaminated the air is that you are breathing, but it usually only measures gamma radiation immediately around the monitoring post, and thus not a true reflection of what a person might be exposed to.  Soil and water need tested for any potential radionuclides that may be there, not just radioactive cesium, and of course food needs tested, as internal radiation exposure from internal emitters ingested or inhaled is very harmful to the body.  

Even though there were many radionuclides released from Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant, they have only routinely tested radioactive iodine and cesium.  Strontium and plutonium fallout data was recently released, which showed a more extensive spread of fission products released than originally thought.

The WHO report only considers Iodine-131(I-131) in terms of the estimated thyroid doses, not taking into consideration Iodine-129 (I-129), a long-lived fission product with a half life of 157 million years.  I-129 is a decay product of Te-129 (t1/2 69.6 min) and Te-129m (t1/2 33.6 d), quite a bit of which was released from Fukushima Dai-ichi, according to pages 4-6 of this report by Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization Takasaki Station in Gunma, Japan.

http://www.cpdnp.jp/pdf/110427Takasaki_report_Apr23.pdf

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology released a map of Te-129m concentration in soil on October 31, 2011, based on soil samples collected in June and July, 2011.

http://radioactivity.mext.go.jp/old/en/1750/2011/10/1750_1031e_2.pdf



I-129 can be used in reconstructing the I-131 distribution as described in the following study.
“Isotopic ratio of radioactive iodine (129I/131I) released from Fukushima Daiichi NPP accident.”
http://www.terrapub.co.jp/journals/GJ/pdf/4604/46040327.pdf

However, the effect of I-129 does not seem to be included in considering damage to thyroid after radiation exposure, but publications such as these suggest that I-129 is indeed not harmless.

“Radiological and Chemical Fact Sheets to Support Health Risk Analyses for Contaminated Areas: Iodine”
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/iodine.pdf

“Iodine-129 Handling Precautions”
http://www.lbl.gov/ehs/html/pdf/iodine129.pdf


US EPA classifies all radionuclides as Group A (known human) carcinogens.  In fact, I-129 is included in the list for mortality and morbidity risk coefficients in the EPA Publication 402-R-99-011   Cancer Risk Coefficients for Environmental Exposure to Radionuclides: Federal Report No. 13.

http://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyPDF.cgi?Dockey=00000C9E.PDF



Moreover, there are other radionuclides, in addition to radioactive iodine, which are known to affect thyroid gland, such as Cesium-137, as described by an exiled Belarusian anatomical pathologist, Yury Bandazhevsky in his study, “Chronic Cs-137 incorporation in children’s organs.”

http://www.smw.ch/docs/pdf200x/2003/35/smw-10226.pdf
https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B68f83tqq7QuaHcxTUUxam9fYVE/edit (Revised version)

In conclusion, is it truly reasonable to say that the thyroid ultrasound abnormalities found in Fukushima children so far are simply part of “the normal evolution of thyroid gland” as described by Karamoskos, considering all the known and unknown facts and factors in this extraordinary circumstance?  Will Ruff and Karamoskos maintain their positions if it were their own children in the position of Fukushima children, still living in contaminated areas, with “glass badges” around their necks to measure cumulative radiation doses (while the radiation damages their bodies all along), breathing contaminated air and dust particles, eating contaminated food and drinking contaminated milk in their school lunches?  

The human body is being used to validate the reaction that such a massive amount of radiation contamination has on it.  This is hugely deviating from the true purpose of “science”:  a tool to benefit the collective knowledge and well-being of mankind, neither at the expense of the other.

This is, indeed, an unprecedented situation where a large number of adults and children are being observed for effects of radiation exposure, in situ.  Allowing such an inhumane, inexcusable act, could not be compatible with the movement away from nuclear power and toward truly safe energy production.








Sep 2, 2012

Curious Remarks About “Whole Genome Analysis” Made by Goshi Hosono, Minister of Environment

Recently there was an NHK (Nippon Hoso Kyokai) news story on the NHK World website regarding the announcement made by Goshi Hosono, Minister of Environment, for “genetic studies” to be conducted in Fukushima.  (NHK, or Japan Broadcasting Association, is Japan's national public broadcasting television station.)

Curiously, this news story was deleted from the NHK World site after only two days.  NHK websites do not maintain archives of news stories for some reason, but the deletion after two days seemed like an exceptional decision.

For reference, NHK also has a track record of maintaining a “double standard” for domestic and international coverage of the same news story.  For instance, NHK was very slow at broadcasting anti-nuclear demonstrations preceding the July restart of Oi nuclear power plant.  Initially, they simply did not cover the story.  Eventually they did a 27-second segment of the onsite demonstration the day before Oi restart in NHK World.  However, the domestic coverage was a cursory mention that a demonstration happened (as in past tense) but the restart was to happen as scheduled.

http://fukushimavoice-eng.blogspot.com/2012/07/nhks-double-standard.html

In this case, however, the original Japanese news story and the English version were not too far off, except the Japanese version was more detailed.  Please compare the two versions below, followed by the screenshots of both.

   **

NHK World English news story published at 10:45 am (JST) on August 31, 2012.

Government to study genetic effects of radiation

The Japanese government plans to study the possible effects of radiation on genes of people affected by the Fukushima nuclear accident. It will begin the tests in the next fiscal year.

Environment minister Goshi Hosono revealed the plan at a meeting in Fukushima City on Thursday.

Fukushima residents have been voicing concerns over possible genetic effects of radioactive substances emitted in the nuclear accident at the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant in March last year.

The ministry plans to conduct blood and other tests. The ministry says it will work with the Fukushima Medical University and research institutions. The first priority will be testing children.

Hosono said after the meeting that the health of Fukushima residents needs to be monitored for more than 50 years. He said understanding radiation influences on the genetic level could help these people in the future.

The ministry plans to request funding to carry out the study in its budget for the next fiscal year.

   **

English translation of an original Japanese version of the NHK news story published at 6:45 am on August 31, 2012.  http://www3.nhk.or.jp/news/html/20120831/k10014669541000.html

Nuclear accident: Genetic effects to be studied

Ministry of Environment has decided on a policy to begin studying the effects of radiation on human genes in people who were affected by TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident.  The study will begin in the next fiscal year.

The plan was revealed by Minister of Environment, Goshi Hosono, at a meeting held in Fukushima-city in the evening of August 30th.

After the nuclear accident, Fukushima residents have been voicing their concerns that  genes might be affected by the spread of radioactive material after the nuclear accident.

For this reason, Ministry of Environment has decided on a policy to study, beginning in the next fiscal year, the possible effects of radiation on human genes by collecting blood samples from those who wish to be tested among the residents who were affected by the nuclear accident.  

He said they have not decided when the study would begin or who would be included in the study.  However, Ministry of Environment will cooperate with Fukushima Medical University and other research institutions to conduct the study, giving priorities to children.

After the meeting, Minister of Environment Hosono stated, “Fukushima residents’ health will need to be monitored not just 5 to 10 years, but for over half a century from now on.  I think understanding the effect (of radiation) on the gene level will prepare us for the future.”

Ministry of Environment plans on including the cost of the study in the request for budgetary appropriations for the next fiscal year.





Curiously, though, a Sankei News website story, published six hours before the original NHK story, at 00:35 am on August 31, 2012, has a slightly different take on the news.

http://sankei.jp.msn.com/affairs/news/120831/dst12083100360000-n1.htm

English translation and the screenshot of the news story to follow.

“Whole genome analysis” in Fukushima declared as part of radiation exposure investigation by Minister of Environment

Ministry of Environment, Goshi Hosono, revealed on August 30, 2012, that the government would begin a “whole genome (genetic information) analysis study” on Fukushima residents, in the next fiscal year, in order to investigate the effects of radiation exposure on genes from the TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident.  He told the press corps after a private round-table conference at Fukushima Medical University in Fukushima-city.

Ministry of Environment Hosono said, “The government intends to squarely face (issues in) Fukushima.  A study on genes might not immediately resolve anxiety (of residents), but an investigation of fundamental genes in humans would lead to future prevention.”  MInistry of Environment will primarily study children.

Ministry of Environment Hosono revealed a plan to include 6.1 billion yen (about $80 million) in the request for budgetary appropriations for the next fiscal year for a new center planned by Fukushima Medical University.  The new center will become a hub for perinatal and pediatric medical care, in addition to Fukushima Prefecture Health Management Survey and radiation researches.




   **
  
The Sankei story strikingly differs from the NHK stories in the use of the term, “whole genome analysis.”  However, their use of the term in the headline suggests that the term was actually used by Minister Hosono.

On the video in the NHK news story, Minister Hosono says, “Health of Fukushima residents will have to be monitored by us, not just for 5 to 10 years, but for over half a century.  I think a clear understanding on the gene level will prepare us for the future.”

What was it that he said prior to this statement referring to genes?  What does he mean by “prepare for the future”?  
  
   ******************************************************************************************

It is a well-known fact that it is not “whole genome analysis” but a chromosomal aberration  study that can be used as an objective and sensitive index of radiation exposure.

   **

Chromosomal aberrations have been studied since the atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

Cytogenetic Study of the Offspring of Atomic Bomb Survivors, Hiroshima and Nagasaki
http://www.nap.edu/openbook.php?record_id=1800&page=344

Chromosome aberrations and malignant disease among A-bomb survivors
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1348854/

   **

Chromosomal aberrations were also studied after the Chernobyl nuclear accident.

Chromosomal aberrations and sickness rates in Chernobyl clean-up workers in the years following the accident
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20065691

The Follow-up Study of Chromosomal aberrations in Chernobyl Clean-up Workers
http://www.rri.kyoto-u.ac.jp/NSRG/reports/kr79/kr79pdf/Slozina.pdf
   **

The Hiroshima International Council for Health Care of the Radiation-exposed (HICARE) has a publication called “Genbaku Hoshasen no Jintai Eikyou 1992 (Effects of A-bomb Radiation on the Human Body) --Digest Edition--.”
http://www.hicare.jp/en/13/hi01.html

Chapter 7 of this publication covers chromosomal aberrations.
http://www.hicare.jp/en/13/e_chapter07.pdf

On page 20, it states, “A strong correlation exists between aberration frequency and distance from the hypocenter, and hence with radiation dose” and “In follow-up studies, chromosomal aberrations in the bone marrow act as an important indicator for the development of various hematopoietic disorders (particularly leukemia).”

      **  

Japanese researchers have known, from the human effects of the atomic bomb, that chromosomal aberrations are correlated with radiation exposure dose and act as an important index for radiation exposure.  Despite this existing knowledge, even at 18 months after the Fukushima accident, the government has not only failed to initiate chromosomal aberration studies but insists on “whole genome analysis.”

   **

Dr. Alexey Yablokov, a Russian biologist and ecologist and one of the authors of ”Chernobyl: Consequences of the Catastrophe for People and the Environment,” made the following statement upon hearing the news of impending “whole genome analysis” in Japan.
   
“It's really a pity that nobody is conducting studies on chromosomal aberrations in Japan.  I can hardly believe it.  Chromosomal aberrations are one of the objective indexes of radiation exposure.

Genetic studies for chromosomal aberrations were started several months after the Chernobyl accident by researchers at the Institute of General Genetics of USSR Academy of Science in Moscow.  All liquidators were examined at the initial study.  Several months later, multiple genetic institutes from Minsk and Kiev joined and examined the evacuees and later thousands of inhabitants in all contaminated territories.  Hundreds of scientific papers have been published as a result of these genetic studies.”

   **

The Japanese government simply cannot fool the world by using the term, “whole genome analysis.”

   **

What needs to happen in Japan is NOT to use Fukushima children exposed to radiation for an "experiment" named "whole genome analysis," but an immediate evacuation of those children from contaminated areas.  

Instead of “calculating estimated exposure doses” from theoretical yet uncertain factors, such as where they were, how long they were there, what they ate, etc., we need to determine “actual damages” the body sustained from radiation exposure.  This could include baseline studies including blood tests, thyroid ultrasound examination and EKG,  urine testing for radioactive material, whole body counter testing, chromosomal aberration studies known to correlate with radiation exposure dose from the atomic bomb research, and observation of lens opacity in the eyes known to correlate with radiation exposure dose from the Chernobyl research.  These studies could be used to assess the current condition of these children (and adults) and to monitor them.  (Dr. Yablokov also suggests the following:  tooth enamel EPR or Electron Paramagnetic Resonance dosimetry; and monitoring changes in buccal epithelium, which is being done in Bryansk, the most polluted area in Russia after Chernobyl.)

Rather than simply conducting follow-up studies for the purpose of gaining data for epidemiological researches to publish, at a later date, “what the occurrence of a certain cancer was,” we need to take care of the children.  We need to thoughtfully and thoroughly help them lead comfortable, happy lives, after they were “forced to sustain radiation exposure,” by closely monitoring their health conditions so that any signs of illness can be caught early for appropriate and swift medical managements.  

Children are a nation’s treasure.  Without taking care of our children, our nation will not survive.  When will they realize that?